The Language of Mens Rea

نویسندگان

  • Matthew R. Ginther
  • Francis X. Shen
  • Richard J. Bonnie
  • Morris B. Hoffman
  • Owen D. Jones
  • René Marois
  • Kenneth W. Simons
چکیده

. J.D. Candidate, Vanderbilt Law School; Ph. D. Candidate in Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University. . McKnight Land-Grant Professor & Associate Professor of Law, University of Minnesota; Executive Director of Education and Outreach, MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience. . Coauthors listed beyond the second author are listed alphabetically by last name. . Harrison Foundation Professor of Medicine and Law, Professor of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, Professor of Public Policy, and Director of the Institute of Law, Psychiatry and Public Policy at the University of Virginia. . District Judge, Second Judicial District (Denver), State of Colorado; Adjunct Professor of Law, University of Colorado and University of Denver; Member, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience; Research Fellow, Gruter Institute for Law and Behavioral Research. . Joe B. Wyatt Distinguished University Professor, New York Alumni Chancellor’s Professor of Law, and Professor of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University; Director, MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience. . Professor, Department of Psychology and Center for Integrated and Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University. . Professor of Law and The Honorable Frank R. Kenison Distinguished Scholar in Law, Boston University School of Law. . Acknowledgments: We received helpful comments from members of the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience and from the organizers of and participants at the Adjudicating Guilty Minds Symposium at Duke Law School, the Guilty Minds: Neuroscience & Criminal Law Symposium of the Denver University Law Review, and conferences of the MacArthur Foundation Law and Neuroscience Project. Roland Nadler and Sarah PrenticeMott provided valuable research assistance. Preparation of this Article was supported in part by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Its contents reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of either the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation or The MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Condoning the Crime: The Elusive Mens Rea for Complicity

There is a long history of disagreement about what the mens rea for complicity is. Some courts take it to be the intention for the underlying crime to succeed while others take mere knowledge of the underlying crime to be sufficient. Still others propose that the mens rea for complicity tracks the mens rea of the underlying crime—the so-called “derivative approach.” However, as argued herein, t...

متن کامل

Two year's experience under Utah's mens rea insanity law.

The author examined the records of the seven defendants found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGI) under Utah's mens rea insanity law during the first two years of its operation. In all of the cases the attorneys, judges, and experts seemed unaware of the new law or confused about its meaning. Examination revealed that the findings of insanity were negotiated with either ignorance of or indif...

متن کامل

Deontic Epistemic stit Logic Distinguishing Modes of 'Mens Rea'

Most juridical systems contain the principle that an act is only unlawful if the agent conducting the act has a `guilty mind' (`mens rea'). Different law systems distinguish di erent modes of mens rea. For instance, American law distinguishes between `knowingly' performing a criminal act, `recklessness', `strict liability', etc. I will show we can formalize several of these categories. The form...

متن کامل

The Structure, coherence and limits of inchoate liability: the new ulterior element

The wrongs targeted by the criminal law need not reside in a defendant’s conduct and its effects (actus reus) or even in her willingness to allow or risk that conduct and its effects (mens rea as to actus reus). Rather, to a greater or lesser extent, wrongs may also reside in a species of mens rea that does not relate to the actus reus of an offence at all, but is rather ulterior to (goes beyon...

متن کامل

Judging mens rea: the tension between folk concepts and legal concepts of intentionality.

Concepts such as intention, motive, or forethought have generated a great deal of doubt, dispute, and confusion in legal decision making. Here we argue for an empirically based strategy of defining and using such mens rea concepts. Instead of the standard approach of settling these concepts by theoretical argument and the debaters' own intuitions, we rely on social psychological research to det...

متن کامل

California's diminished capacity defense: evolution and transformation.

Diminished capacity survives in California as a severely attenuated mens rea defense known as diminished actuality. Some other states have similar limited strict mens rea defenses. The lost advantages of California's former expanded concept of diminished capacity are reviewed. As opposed to the all-or-none insanity defense, mens rea defenses permit the trier of fact to find gradations of guilt ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014